DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25630898·sf·Civil·Discovery
Hearing in 2 daysDENIED

BRIGID ACUNA VS. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL

Motion To Compel Further Answer To Requests For Admission, Set One (1); Request For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
302
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBRIGID ACUNA
DefendantTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Attorneys

Paul V. Bennettfor Plaintiff

Ruling

Matter on calendar for Monday, August 24, 2026, Line 11, PLAINTIFF BRIGID ACUNA's Motion To Compel Further Answer To Requests For Admission, Set One (1); Request For Monetary Sanctions.

3 - Plaintiff Brigid Acuna motion to compel further answers to her set one requests for admission 3 and 7 and request for monetary sanctions is denied. Defendant The Regents of the University of California's request for monetary sanctions is also denied.

Before filing this motion Acuna's counsel should have met and conferred with the Regents' counsel about the asserted insufficiency of the Regents' amended responses served July 28, 2026, but given the parties' positions it is unlikely that any meet and confer would have been productive so the failure to meet and confer is, for this time only and reluctantly, excused. The Regents' supplemental responses to requests 3 and 7 are code-compliant, not incomplete or evasive. While unsuccessful, Acuna's positions as to the supplemental responses do not lack substantial justification.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share