DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24LBCV01741·la·Civil·Minor's Compromise
Hearing in 3 daysCONTINUED (Pending testimony and submission of completed proposed order)

In the Matter of Minor Plaintiff

Petition to approve compromise of minor

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
S27
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Monetary amounts referenced

$65,000$135,000$26,000$39,000

Parties

PlaintiffMinor Plaintiff
PlaintiffVeronica

Ruling

(Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse: Dept. S27) August 25, 2026 DEPARTMENT S27 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

notice of settlement of entire case.

On 4/14/26, the parties appeared at an OSC re: Dismissal (Settlement). Because there is a minor plaintiff in the action, the Court scheduled a hearing on a petition to approve compromise of minor for 6/25/26. The Court also continued the OSC re: Dismissal to 6/25/26. Because papers had not been filed prior to the 6/25/26 hearing, the Court continued the hearing to 8/25/26. On 7/23/26, Petitioner filed papers in support of the petition.

The minor plaintiff was exposed to mold, cockroaches, beg bugs, and substandard conditions as a result of Defendants' acts. The minor plaintiff continues to use an inhaler and attributes his condition to the above-detailed exposure to various toxins in the unit.

Defendants have agreed to pay the minor plaintiff $65,000 to settle his claims, and to pay his mother and GAL, Veronica, $135,000 to settle her claims. The mother's claims were settled for a greater amount because she alleges she suffered a sexual assault as a result of the condition of the property, rendering her damages more extensive than those of her son.

If the minor's settlement is approved, $26,000 will be used for attorneys' fees and the balance of $39,000 will be invested in a single premium deferred annuity. The Court typically limits attorneys' fees in cases involving minors to 25% of the minor's settlement, but has reviewed Counsel's declaration in support of the request and is inclined to award the 40% requested in light of the more extensive effort that went into settling this action.

Pursuant to CRC 7.952, unless excused from doing so, Petitioner and Plaintiff must appear and testify to the satisfaction of the Court before the Court grants the petition. Plaintiff is 17 years of age, and therefore the Court will require him to appear and testify before granting the petition.

Petitioner lodged a proposed order with the petition, but the majority of the order is not filled out. Petitioner must lodge a proposed order with all details filled out on the form and/or bring a proposed order to Court. If the Court is satisfied with the testimony at the hearing, and if the completed proposed order is lodged prior to the hearing, the Court will process the order at the conclusion of the hearing. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share