DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2026-01547608-CU-PO-CJC·orange·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing todayCONTINUED

Omega Accounting Solutions, Inc. vs. Acme Freight

Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Case

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
C31
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 16, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

KF Properties was dismissed with prejudice as to the entire action of all parties and all causes of action on 7/14/26. (ROA 42.)

It does not appear from the allegations in Aceves and SCE that these matters involve the same incident. Aceves alleges the subject premises is 845 West La Veta Avenue, Ste. 108 Los Angeles, CA 90069. (Compl. ¶ 8.) Aceves further alleges the incident occurred on 4/17/2024 while Plaintiff was performing landscaping work and made contact with underground electric wiring installed and maintained by Defendants. (Compl. ¶ 9.)

SCE alleges it was the owner of a certain primary cable, located at or near 805 W. La Veta Avenue, Orange, CA 92868. (Compl. ¶ 12.) SCE further alleges Defendants damaged SCE’s primary cable while performing excavation work on 4/14/2024. (Compl. ¶¶12-15.)

As the complaints allege different locations (Los Angeles versus Orange), actions (landscaping versus excavation), and dates of incident (4/14/2024 versus 4/17/2024), the Court does not find they involve “a common question of law or fact.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1048, subd. (a).)

SCE to give notice.

5 Omega Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Case Accounting Continued to 10/16/2026. Solutions, Inc. vs. Acme Freight 30-2026- 01547608-CU- PO-CJC 6 Becerra Law Motion to Transfer Venue and Request for Fees and Firm vs. David Costs Yeremian & Defendants David Yeremian & Associates, Inc., D.Law, Associates, Inc. Inc., Law Offices of Sahag Majarian II, and Law Offices of 30-2026- 01564931-CU- Neal J. Fialkow, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue and NP-CJC Request for Fees and Costs Pursuant to CCP § 396b(b) is GRANTED.

The Court DENIES Defendants’ and Plaintiffs’ requests for judicial notice as unnecessary to the analysis. (Appel v. Superior Court (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 329, 342 fn. 6.)

Code of Civil Procedure section 395.5 governs venue for corporate defendants. “A corporation or association may be sued in the county where the contract is made or is to

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share