DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FDI-26-802836·sf·FamilyLaw·Child Custody and Visitation
Hearing 9 days agoGRANTED

Yu Jing Tan v. Zhongluan Huang

Request for Order: Custody and/or Visitation

Hearing date
Aug 13, 2026
Department
403
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PetitionerYu Jing Tan
RespondentZhongluan Huang

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 YU JING TAN,) Case Number: FDI-26-802836) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: August 13, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 ZHONGIUAN HUANG,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF REQUEST FOR ORDER: CUSTODY AND/OR VISITATION 13 (ORDERS) CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (PARENTING TIME) 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 The parties are ordered to appear. The parties may appear in person in Department 403 or 16 remotely by Zoom video. If a party chooses to appear by video, that party must abide by the 17 Notice and Instructions for Remote Appearances in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 18 A.

Procedural History 19 1) The parties are Petitioner Yu Jing Tan (Mother) and Respondent Zhongluan Huang (Father). 20 They share one minor child: Charlotte Huang (DOB: 12/26/24). 21 2) On April 7, 2026, Mother filed a Request for Order seeking initial orders for child custody and 22 visitation. 23 3) On June 8, 2026, the Court conducted a “Readiness” hearing and referred the parties to FCS 24 Mediation to occur on July 17, 2026 and set a return hearing for August 13, 2026. 25 4) On July 17, 2026, the parties attended FCS Mediation and stipulated to the following orders: 26 a.

Joint Legal Custody; 27 b. The parties shall enroll in Kids Turn co-parenting class. 28 c. The parties shall enroll in co-parenting therapy. The parties shall meet and confer 29 regarding selecting a therapist.

1 5) On July 22, 2026, Father filed a Responsive Declaration, which has been read and considered by 2 the Court. 3 6) On August 3, 2026, Mother filed a Reply, which has been read and considered by the Court. 4 B. Findings and Order 5 1) This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child 6 Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. A violation of this order may subject the party in 7 violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both. The country of habitual residence of the minor 8 child(ren) is the United States. 9 2) The parties shall share joint legal and joint physical custody of the minor child. 10 3) Each parent must notify the other of the name and address of each health practitioner who 11 examines or treats the child.

Such notification shall be made at the time the examination or 12 procedure is scheduled. Such notification is required unless examination or treatment is a result 13 of a medical emergency. In such emergency situations, the parent taking the child in for an 14 emergency procedure must notify the other parent while they are on their way to the treating 15 professional’s medical facility. 16 4) The parenting time with each parent shall be two days (48 hours) on and two days (48 hours) off 17 and continue to rotate thereafter.

The parenting time will commence with Mother having the 18 minor child from 5:00 p.m., on Thursday, August 13, 2026 through 5:00 p.m., on Saturday, 19 August 15, 2026. Father will then have care and custody of the minor child from 5:00 p.m., on 20 Saturday, August 15, 2026 through 5:00 p.m., on Monday, August 17, 2026. They will continue 21 to rotate caring for the minor child every 48 hours, until further order of the Court. 22 5) All existing orders, not in conflict with the orders made herein, shall remain in full force and 23 effect. 24 6) The parties are free to modify the parenting plan any way they see fit and in the minor child’s 25 best interest, provided such agreement is memorialized in writing (i.e., text, email, or any other 26 form of writing). 27 7) Counsel for Mother shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 28 8) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within 29 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other

1 party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 2 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the 3 proposed order after hearing directly to the court. Failure to submit the order after hearing within 4 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in 5 accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d). 6

10

14

18

22

26

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share