DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682438·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing todaySUSTAINED, subject to opposition, with leave to amend within 5 days

BRIDGE BRIGHTHAVEN LLC VS. DEENA MILLER

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBRIDGE BRIGHTHAVEN LLC
DefendantDEENA MILLER

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 21, 2026. Line 7. DEFENDANT DEENA MILLER DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED, subject to opposition, with leave to amend within 5 days to address in good faith the defect raised by the demurrer. The demurrer is sustained under CCP 430.10(e) only. The First Amended Complaint is not so uncertain that Defendant cannot reasonably respond. =(501/SKF) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share