DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25628756·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing todayCONTINUED

PRODING, LTD., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. JERNIGAN-CLAY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 17, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPRODING, LTD.
DefendantJERNIGAN-CLAY, LLC
DefendantNUNAN-CLAY, LLC
DefendantBURGUNDY PROPERTIES, LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25628756 - August 21, 2026 Hearing date: August 21, 2026 Case number: CGC25628756 Case title: PRODING, LTD., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. JERNIGAN-CLAY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25628756 | Case Title: | | PRODING, LTD., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS. JERNIGAN-CLAY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 21, 2026. Line 3. DEFENDANT JERNIGAN-CLAY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, NUNAN-CLAY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY, BURGUNDY PROPERTIES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT is continued to September 17, 2026 on the Court's own motion. =(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share