DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678504·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 3 months agoOFF CALENDAR

CRYSTAL R. FLORIDA VS. MICHAEL D. RAGO ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
May 19, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCRYSTAL R. FLORIDA
DefendantMICHAEL D. RAGO
DefendantLINDSEY TREDWAY
DefendantSUTTER
DefendantDAVALLOU
DefendantROBERT RAGO

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678504 - May 19, 2026 Hearing date: May 19, 2026 Case number: CUD25678504 Case title: CRYSTAL R. FLORIDA VS. MICHAEL D. RAGO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678504 | Case Title: | | CRYSTAL R. FLORIDA VS. MICHAEL D. RAGO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 19, 2026. Line 10.1.

DEFENDANT LINDSEY TREDWAY DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1170(b) and 1010.6. Additionally, all moving papers must be served on the attorney for each party separately represented, and on each self-represented party who has appeared in this action. (See CRC 1.21.)

No proof of service on Post Judgment Claimant-Defendants Sutter or Davallou. Proof of service on file indicates Defendant Robert Rago was served electronically. However, no indication that Defendant Robert Rago, who is self-represented, has expressly consented to electronic service. Moreover, the File & Serve Xpress Transaction Report attached to the proof of service indicates Plaintiff's Counsel was served on behalf of Defendant Robert Rago. Plaintiff's Counsel does not represent Defendant Robert Rago. =(501/DWH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share