DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD20667353·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 3 months agoOFF CALENDAR. No competent proof of service.

STANYAN HOLDINGS LLC VS. STANYAN ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL

Motion To Compel Production Of Documents

Hearing date
May 19, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSTANYAN HOLDINGS LLC
DefendantSTANYAN ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC
DefendantLAURENCE NASEY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD20667353 - May 19, 2026 Hearing date: May 19, 2026 Case number: CUD20667353 Case title: STANYAN HOLDINGS LLC VS. STANYAN ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL Case Number: | | CUD20667353 | Case Title: | | STANYAN HOLDINGS LLC VS. STANYAN ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Compel Production Of Documents | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 19, 2026. Line 7.

DEFENDANT LAURENCE NASEY Motion To Compel Production Of Documents is OFF CALENDAR. No competent proof of service. Proof of personal service on file is signed by a declarant who did not personally deliver the papers. No other declaration on file from any person who personally delivered the papers. =(501/DWH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share