DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25629411·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

LINDA ZIDER VS. RONALD SOMERS ET AL

Amended Notice Of Special Demurrer And Special Demurrer To The Fourth Cause Of Action Of Plaintiffs' Complaint

Hearing date
May 19, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 28, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLINDA ZIDER
DefendantRONALD SOMERS
DefendantJOEL YANG

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25629411 - May 19, 2026 Hearing date: May 19, 2026 Case number: CGC25629411 Case title: LINDA ZIDER VS. RONALD SOMERS ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25629411 | Case Title: | | LINDA ZIDER VS. RONALD SOMERS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Amended Notice Of Special Demurrer And Special Demurrer To The Fourth Cause Of Action Of Plaintiffs' Complaint | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 19, 2026. Line 6.

DEFENDANT RONALD SOMERS, JOEL YANG Amended Notice Of Special Demurrer And Special Demurrer To The Fourth Cause Of Action Of Plaintiffs' Complaint is CONTINUED to May 28, 2026 for moving party to provide the Court a courtesy copy of the complaint no later than May 21, 2026 with a cover letter reflecting new hearing date. =(501/DWH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share