DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0054789·placer·Civil·Consumer Protection
Hearing 8 days agoGRANTED

WEBB, JORDAN v. GENERAL MOTORS

Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$11,767.50

Parties

PlaintiffJORDAN WEBB
DefendantGENERAL MOTORS

Attorneys

Tim Whelanfor Plaintiff
A. Valitskayafor Plaintiff
I. Gonzalezfor Plaintiff

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 14, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

14. S-CV-0054789 WEBB, JORDAN v. GENERAL MOTORS

NOTE: If oral argument is requested in this case, it shall be heard on AUGUST 18, 2026 AT 2:30 P.M. in DEPARTMENT 1.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs

The motion is granted.

The court has carefully considered the number of hours expended by counsel along with the hourly rates for comparable work within Placer County and awards $11,767.50 broken down as follows:

NAME RATE HOURS TOTAL Tim Whelan $425/hr 5.9 $02,507.50 A. Valitskaya $400/hr 17.9 $07,160.00 I. Gonzalez $375/hr 5.6 $02,100.00 TOTAL 29.4 $11,767.50

The court has carefully considered the issues presented in the case; the nature and extent the litigation precluded other employment for counsel; and the contingent nature of any fee award and declines to apply either a positive or negative multiplier. (Mikhaeilpoor v. BMW of North America, LLC (2020) 48 Cal.App.5th 240, 247-248.)

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share