FARBER, JOHN v. APPLES & HONEYBEES
Defendants Jeffrey Slott and Law Offices of Jeffrey Slott, APC’s Motion to Quash Doe Amendment; Defendants Jeffrey Slott and Law Offices of Jeffrey Slott, APC’s Demurrer to the Complaint; Defendants Jeffrey Slott and Law Offices of Jeffrey Slott, APC’s Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 14, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.
11. S-CV-0054259 FARBER, JOHN v. APPLES & HONEYBEES
NOTE: If oral argument is requested in this case, it shall be heard on AUGUST 18, 2026 AT 2:30 P.M. in DEPARTMENT 1.
Defendants Jeffrey Slott and Law Offices of Jeffrey Slott, APC’s Motion to Quash Doe Amendment
The appearances of the parties are required at the hearing.
Defendants Jeffrey Slott and Law Offices of Jeffrey Slott, APC’s Demurrer to the Complaint
The appearances of the parties are required at the hearing.
Defendants Jeffrey Slott and Law Offices of Jeffrey Slott, APC’s Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint
The appearances of the parties are required for the hearing.
///
PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”