DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CECG05340·fresno·Probate·Probate
Hearing 9 days agoDENIED without prejudice

In re: Khalil Jordan Washington

Expedited Petition to Compromise Claim of Minor

Hearing date
Aug 13, 2026
Department
503
Prevailing
Opposing Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$30,000$743.80$175

Parties

PetitionerKhalil Jordan Washington

Ruling

(34) Tentative Ruling

Re: In re: Khalil Jordan Washington Superior Court Case No. 25CECG05340

Hearing Date: August 13, 2026 (Dept. 503)

Motion: Expedited Petition to Compromise Claim of Minor

Intended Ruling:

To deny the petition, without prejudice, for the reasons explained below. In the event that oral argument is requested the minor is excused from appearing.

Explanation:

According to the amended petition, the minor has fully recovered from injuries including emotional distress and trouble sleeping, following a car collision on March 17, 2025. The minor is to receive a gross settlement of $30,000 with the balance of the settlement after medical costs, attorney fees and litigation costs to be deposited in a blocked account. An issue with respect to costs to be paid from the settlement remains and prevents approval.

The amended petition requests expenses in the amount of $743.80 from the settlement including a “Court Blocked Acct. Fee” in the amount of $175. The court is aware of no such a fee associated with the creation of a blocked account and does not find it reasonable to charge the fee against the minor’s recovery without explanation as to what the fee is and to whom it is paid. (Prob. Code, § 3601.)

The court issued an intended ruling on July 27, 2026 identifying the above issues and allowing the filing of an amended petition in anticipation of the hearing set for August 13, 2026. The amended petition filed fails to provide an adequate explanation of the $175 fee counsel is seeking as a “Court Blocked Acct. Fee.” Accordingly, the amended petition is denied without prejudice.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: JS on 8/10/2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

13

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share