DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CECG02004·fresno·Probate·Quiet Title
Hearing 9 days agoDENIED without prejudice

Boys & Girls Clubs of Fresno County v. The Optimist Boys Club of Fresno, Inc., et al.

Application for Default Judgment

Hearing date
Aug 13, 2026
Department
503
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffBoys & Girls Clubs of Fresno County
DefendantThe Optimist Boys Club of Fresno, Inc.

Ruling

(36) Tentative Ruling

Re: Boys & Girls Clubs of Fresno County v. The Optimist Boys Club of Fresno, Inc., et al. Superior Court Case No. 25CECG02004

Hearing Date: August 13, 2026 (Dept. 503)

Motion: Application for Default Judgment

Tentative Ruling:

To deny without prejudice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 761.020.)

Explanation:

Statutory Elements of Quiet Title Not Well Pled

The complaint shall be verified and shall include all of the following:

(a) A description of the property that is the subject of the action. In the case of tangible personal property, the description shall include its usual location. In the case of real property, the description shall include both its legal description and its street address or common designation, if any.

(b) The title of the plaintiff as to which a determination under this chapter is sought and the basis of the title. If the title is based upon adverse possession, the complaint shall allege the specific facts constituting the adverse possession.

(c) The adverse claims to the title of the plaintiff against which a determination is sought.

(d) The date as of which the determination is sought. If the determination is sought as of a date other than the date the complaint is filed, the complaint shall include a statement of the reasons why a determination as of that date is sought.

(e) A prayer for the determination of the title of the plaintiff against the adverse claims.

(Code Civ. Proc., § 761.020, emphasis added.)

Although a legal description is included in the verified complaint, it does not appear that plaintiff has pled the common designation of the property. Moreover, in the court’s view, in the case of real property, a common designation is likely to be more

effective notice, since a layperson may not immediately recognize the legal description of a property.

Unless plaintiff provides authority excusing adherence to Code of Civil Procedure section 761.020, the court intends to deny the application for default judgment for failure to plead a statutory element.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: JS on 8/11/2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

19

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share