DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV002684·sacramento·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing todayThis hearing is vacated. The parties did not file a joint letter outlining the discovery dispute.

ENRIQUEZ vs BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS, INC., et al.

Informal Discovery Conference (IDC)

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
8A
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffENRIQUEZ
DefendantBOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS, INC.

Ruling

25CV002684: ENRIQUEZ vs BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS, INC., et al. 08/21/2026 Informal Discovery Conference (IDC) in Department 8A

Tentative Ruling

This hearing is vacated. The parties did not file a joint letter outlining the discovery dispute.(See SSC-24-6 General Standing Order, Paragraph 11(e) states, "At least three court days before the scheduled IDC, counsel shall file a joint letter outlining the discovery dispute, not exceeding 5 pages, single-spaced. No additional documents shall be attached to the letter. A courtesy copy with the subject line "JOINT LETTER" shall be emailed to the assigned department." The General Complex Standing Order is located on the Court's website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/345/639086453889930000.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share