DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
34-2023-00336240-CU-PO-GDS·sacramento·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing over 1 year agoDROPPED

Renita Williams vs. Equity Management, Inc

Motion to Consolidate

Hearing date
Jan 3, 2025
Department
47
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRenita Williams
DefendantEquity Management, Inc

Ruling

34-2023-00336240-CU-PO-GDS: Renita Williams vs. Equity Management, Inc 01/03/2025 Hearing on Motion to Consolidate in Department 47

Tentative Ruling

NOTICE: If oral arguments are requested or appearances are required, the hearing may be conducted in person or remotely via ZoomGov [which includes telephonic and teleconferencing options]. No Court Call appearances will be permitted. If you choose to use Zoom you must use your first and last name on your ZoomGov account so the court can positively identify you. The Department 47 ZoomLink is https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/sscdept47 and the ZoomGov ID is: 16173813009. Appearances via videoconference using the above link are preferred. To appear on ZoomGov by phone, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the ZoomGov ID referenced above, available phone commands include *6 to mute/unmute or *9 to raise your hand. If you experience issues joining your hearing, please contact the clerk in Department 47 at (916) 874-5487 for assistance.

The notice of motion fails to provide notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as modified for matters appearing on the Law and Motion in the Presiding Judge’s department. The notice must include both the verbatim notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as set forth in Local Rule 1.06(D) and the verbatim notice of the modifications to the tentative ruling system for motions pending in the Presiding Judge’s department, as forth in Local Rule 1.06(E). Counsel for moving party shall contact all other parties and advise them of the full tentative ruling system, including that the tentative ruling will be posted two court days prior to the hearing date and that requests for oral argument must be made by noon the court day before the hearing.

The hearing is DROPPED from calendar for lack of jurisdiction.

Requirements for a motion to consolidate are set forth in Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.350. The motion must be filed in the lowest numbered case along with a proof of service demonstrating the motion was served on all attorneys of record and all non-represented parties in all cases sought to be consolidated. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.350(a)(2).) The notice of motion must be filed in all cases to be consolidated, must contain the caption of those cases, and must identify the parties in each case, those who have appeared, and their respective attorneys of record. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.350(a).) The use of the word “must” in this rule indicates these requirements are mandatory. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 1.5(a)(1).) Defective notice deprives the Court of jurisdiction. (Lee v. Placer Title Co. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 503, 509.)

The notice of motion fails to identify the parties in all actions to be consolidated and their

34-2023-00336240-CU-PO-GDS: Renita Williams vs. Equity Management, Inc 01/03/2025 Hearing on Motion to Consolidate in Department 47

attorneys of record as required by Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.350(a)(1)(A). Moving Parties failed to file the notice of motion in all actions to be consolidated as required by Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.350(a)(1)(C).

This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 47. Any party requesting an oral argument must contact the clerk at (916) 874-5487 and opposing counsel or parties in pro per by 12:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing. If a proper request for hearing is not made, this shall become the order of the Court.

Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government Code section 68086 and California Rules of Court, rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp- 13.Pdf A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list, Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk.

If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will be forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an official reporter will be provided.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share