DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
34-2022-00325937-CU-OE-GDS·sacramento·Civil·Employment
Hearing over 2 years agoThe Court received the parties’ Joint Case Management Conference Statement. The parties attended a mediation that was not successful and have resumed discovery. A further Case Management Conference is set for May 31, 2024.

Rachel Monique Serna vs. H&R Foods Inc

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Nov 30, 2023
Department
27
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 31, 2024
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRachel Monique Serna
DefendantH&R Foods Inc

Ruling

34-2022-00325937-CU-OE-GDS: Rachel Monique Serna vs. H&R Foods Inc 11/30/2023 Case Management Conference in Department 27

Tentative Ruling

NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED

No appearance required. The Court received the parties' Joint Case Management Conference Statement filed November 15, 2023. The parties attended a mediation that was not successful and have resumed discovery. A further Case Management Conference is set for May 31, 2024 at 10:30 a.m. The parties are to file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement at least 15 calendar days prior to the hearing that includes a proposed briefing schedule.

To request oral argument on this matter, you must call Department 27 at (916) 874-6697 by 4:00 p.m., the court day before this hearing and notification of oral argument must be made to the opposing party/counsel. If no call is made, the tentative ruling becomes the order of the court. (Local Rule 1.06.)

Please check your tentative ruling prior to the next Court date at www.saccourt.ca.gov prior to the above referenced hearing date.

If oral argument is requested, the parties may appear by Zoom with the links below:

To join by Zoom link – https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/sscdept27 To join by Room: Dept27a To join by phone dial (833) 568-8864 / ID: 16120204632

Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp- 13.Pdf

A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list, Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk.

34-2022-00325937-CU-OE-GDS: Rachel Monique Serna vs. H&R Foods Inc 11/30/2023 Case Management Conference in Department 27

If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will be forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an official reporter will be provided.

Counsel for Plaintiff is directed to notice all parties of this order.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share