Gagon vs Oh
Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Dismissal (CCP 473)
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
24CV092695: GAGON vs OH 08/21/2026 Hearing on Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Dismissal (CCP 473) filed by Sean Gagon (Plaintiff) CRS# 300943452680 in Department 520
Tentative Ruling - 08/17/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson
The Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Dismissal filed by Sean Gagon on 07/22/2026 is Granted.
Dismissal entered on February 26, 2026 is HEREBY SET ASIDE AND VACATED.
Plaintiff shall serve complaint forthwith and file a proof of service in advance of the CMC date.
Case Management Conference re service of complaint is scheduled for 02/08/2027 at 10:20 AM in Department 520 at Hayward Hall of Justice.
NOTICE: This tentative ruling will automatically become the courts final order on August 21, 2026 unless, by no later than 4:00 P.M. on August 20, 2026, a party to the action notifies BOTH: 1) the court by emailing Dept520@alameda.courts.ca.gov; AND 2) all opposing counsel or selfrepresented parties (by telephone or email) that the party is contesting this tentative ruling.
The subject line (RE:) of the email must state: Request for CONTESTED HEARING: [the case name], [number]. When a party emails to contest a tentative ruling, the party must identify the specific holding(s) within the ruling they wish to contest via oral argument.
The court does not provide court reporters for hearings in civil departments. A party who wants a record of the proceedings must engage a private court reporter. (Local Rule 3.95.) Any privately retained court reporter must also participate via video conference. Their email must be provided to the court at the time the Notice of Contest is emailed.
ALL CONTESTED LAW AND MOTION HEARINGS ARE CONDUCTED VIA REMOTE VIDEO unless an in person appearance is required by the court. Invitations to participate in the video proceeding will be sent by the court upon receipt of timely notice of contest. A party may give email notice they will appear in court in person for the hearing, however all other counsel/parties and the JUDGE MAY APPEAR REMOTELY.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”