DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24STCV08768·la·Civil·Contract
Hearing todayGRANTED

Nus Apparels Ltd v. Gtex Global Sourcing, Inc., et al.

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
732
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffNus Apparels Ltd
DefendantGtex Global Sourcing, Inc.

Attorneys

Gabriel Z. Reynoso(Winget Spadafora & Schwartzberg LLP)for Defendant

Ruling

Case No.:

Hearing Date: August 21, 2026 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Gabriel Z. Reynoso and Winget Spadafora & Schwartzberg LLP's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant GTEX Global Sourcing, Inc.. | Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 284 states that "[t]he attorney in an action or special proceeding may be changed at any time before or after judgment or final determination" upon either consent of both client and attorney, or "[u] pon order of the court, upon the application of either client or attorney, after notice from one to the other.." (Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 284, subd. (b).)

California Rule of Court ("CRC") Rule 3.1362 states the requirements for a motion to be relieved as counsel under Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 284. No memorandum is required (CRC Rule 3.1362, subd. (b)), but the motion must be accompanied by (1) a declaration stating why a motion has been brought instead of filing a consent (without compromising attorney-client confidentiality) (CRC Rule 3.1362, subd. (c)); (2) proof of service of the motion (CRC Rule 3.1362, subd. (d); and (3) all hearing dates scheduled in the action or proceeding, including the date of trial. (CRC Rule 3.1362, subd. (e).) "The proposed order relieving counsel must be prepared on the Order Granting Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel--Civil (form MC-053) and must be lodged with the court with the moving papers." (Ibid.)

The present motion is brought by Gabriel Z. Reynoso for the firm Winget Spadafora & Schwartzberg LLP, counsel for Defendant GTEX Global Sourcing, Inc. The motion includes a declaration of counsel attesting to the breakdown of the attorney-client relationship, a proof of service, and a proposed order form listing upcoming dates of hearing in this action. Trial is set for May 18, 2027.

Defendant GTEX Global Sourcing, Inc., is a corporate entity. Corporate litigants cannot represent themselves in unlimited civil actions. (See CLD Construction, Inc. v. City of San Ramon (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1141, 1145.) "[T]he court retains authority to dismiss an action if an unrepresented corporation does not obtain counsel within reasonable time." (CLD Construction, Inc, supra, 120 Cal.App.4th at p. 1150.)

Accordingly, concurrent with this order, the court sets an OSC re: GTEX Global Sourcing, Inc.'s retention of counsel in this action, with the warning that its failure to do so could result in the striking of its pleadings and the entry of its default.

Gabriel Z. Reynoso and Winget Spadafora & Schwartzberg LLP's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant GTEX Global Sourcing, Inc. is GRANTED, effective upon moving counsel filing with the court proof of service of a copy of the signed order on the client, as set forth in Cal. Rules of Court Rule 3.1362(e). The court sets an OSC re: GTEX Global Sourcing, Inc.'s retention of counsel in this action, with the warning that its failure to retain counsel could result in the striking of its pleadings and the entry of its default.

Dated: August 21, 2026

__________________________________________ Hon. Richard S. Kemalyan Judge of the Superior Court | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share