| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Respondent's Request for Order re Bifurcation, etc.
Stanislaus County - FamilyLaw - https://www.stanislaus.courts.ca.gov/online-services/tentative-rulings/family-law-t entative-rulings Family Law Tentative Rulings
The family court issues tentative ruling announcements on the court day prior to the scheduled hearing for specific types of motions. Tentative rulings are only provided on the Internet and posted in the clerk's office lobby. Internet postings occur at 3:30 p.m. daily. Parties are not required to give notice of intent to appear to preserve the right to a hearing. The tentative ruling will not become final until the hearing. (Stan. Cnty. Local Rules, rule 7.05.1)
However, as a courtesy to the Court, and other parties or counsel with matters on calendar, notice of intended appearance or non-appearance is encouraged and may be sent by e-mail to the following address: familylaw.tentatives@stanct.org between the hours of 1:30 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. If you do not receive a confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you may call to speak directly with a Calendar Clerk at 209-530-3107.
Any party filing pleadings or documents on a tentative ruling matter within five (5) days of the hearing should provide a courtesy copy to the Courtroom Clerk and the Court's Family Law Research Attorney by placing a copy in the drop box slot on the door of Room 223, Second Floor of the main Courthouse. Failure to do so may prevent the Court from consideration of such, may result in a continuance, and/or may be considered in the award of conduct-based fees and costs. (Stan. Cnty. Local Rules, rule 7.05.1(B).)
All parties and counsel are required to meet and confer in a good faith effort to resolve the dispute on any request, motion or hearing, with the exception of those involving domestic violence, and to exchange any documents upon which reliance will be made at the hearing. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.98; Stan. Cnty. Local Rules, rule 7.05.1(C).) Failure to do so may result in a continuance and may be considered in the award of conduct-based fees and costs, or both. If sufficient information regarding an adequate pre-hearing meet and confer effort is not provided in the moving and opposing papers, in the Court's discretion, the matter may be placed at the end of the calendar and not called until the parties or counsel advise the Court that they have complied with their obligations and/or resolved the matter s own motion, the Court orders Respondent to comply within thirty (30) days of this ruling and admonishes Respondent that the failure to do so may result in the striking of the Response and entry of Respondent's default.
Date: 5/19/2026
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Alan Cassidy in Department #11: THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge J. Richard Distaso in Department #13: FL-25-001533 - GUERRERO VS GUERRERO Petitioner's Request for Order re Spousal Support, etc.-- HEARING REQUIRED
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Sarah Birmingham in Department #14: THERE ARE NO TENTATIVES.
The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Maria Elena Ramos-Ratliff in Department #25: FL-25-001835 - GAYLORD VS GAYLORD Respondent's Request for Order re Bifurcation, etc.-- HEARING REQUIRED.
The Court has read and considered the moving and opposing papers. There are disputed questions of fact regarding Petitioner's claim of "irreparable harm" regarding early termination of marital status. Given the public policy favoring early termination of marital status, and the opposing party's burden of proof to overcome this presumption, counsel are directed to meet and confer as to the extent to which the "protective conditions" that accompany grant of the motion are sufficient to mitigate the asserted prejudice raised by Petitioner.
For instance, the alleged adverse tax consequences may be mitigated in whole or in part by means of the "hold harmless" protective conditions that are part of the Judicial Council form order. Whether this is possible with respect to the country club membership dispute, and whether this is sufficient to warrant denying the status termination request without prejudice, are matters that counsel are invited to appear and be heard about.