DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0048408·placer·Civil·Civil
Hearing in about 3 hoursGRANTED

COLE, CASSANDRA v. APPLEGATE MOTEL

Motion to Compel Successor-In-Interest Matthew Cole’s Deposition; Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCASSANDRA COLE
DefendantAPPLEGATE MOTEL
DefendantDAN LUIS
DefendantLUIS PROPERTIES, LLC

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 21, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

8. S-CV-0048408 COLE, CASSANDRA v. APPLEGATE MOTEL

Defendants Applegate Motel, Dan Luis, and Luis Properties, LLC’s Motion to Compel Successor-In-Interest Matthew Cole’s Deposition

The unopposed motion is granted.

Successor-in-interest Matthew Cole shall appear on a date, time, and at a location noticed by defendants for his deposition. The deposition shall occur by August 31, 2026.

Case Management Conference

The matter is set for a five (5) day jury trial on MONDAY, APRIL 5, 2027 at 8:30 A.M. in a department to be assigned. The parties may contact Master Calendar/Jury Services the Friday prior to trial to receive their department assignment.

A civil trial conference is set for FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 2027 at 8:30 A.M. in DEPARTMENT 3. The parties are referred to the Placer Local Rules for more information regarding the documents required for the hearing.

A mandatory settlement conference is set for WEDNESDAY, MARCH 17, 2027 at 8:30 A.M. in DEPARTMENT 6. The parties shall report directly to Department 6, located at the Historic Auburn Courthouse.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share