DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
M-CV-0086705·placer·Civil·Contract
Hearing in about 3 hoursDropped

AMEX NATL BANK v. McCLUSKY, BRENT

Motion for entry of judgment

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 21, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

These are the tentative rulings for the FRIDAY, AUGUST 21, 2026 at 8:30 A.M., civil law and motion calendar. The tentative ruling will be the court’s final ruling unless notice of appearance and request for oral argument are given to all parties and the court by 4:00 p.m., THURSDAY, AUGUST 20, 2026. Notice of request for argument to the court must be made by calling (916) 408-6481. Requests for oral argument made by any other method will not be accepted. Prevailing parties are required to submit orders after hearing to the court within 10 court days of the scheduled hearing date and approval as to form by opposing counsel. Court reporters are not provided by the court. Parties may provide a court reporter at their own expense.

NOTE: PARTIES MAY REQUEST A REMOTE APPEARANCE FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. (PLACER COURT LOCAL RULE 10.24.) More information is available at the court’s website: www.placer.courts.ca.gov.

Except as otherwise noted, these tentative rulings are issued by COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR. If oral argument is requested, it shall be heard at 8:30 a.m. in DEPARTMENT 1 located at the Historic Auburn Courthouse, 101 Maple Street, Auburn, California.

1. M-CV-0086705 AMEX NATL BANK v. McCLUSKY, BRENT

The reserved hearing for plaintiff’s motion for entry of judgment is dropped from the calendar as no moving papers were filed with the court.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share