CAPITAL ONE, N.A. VS HOLMAN-IDOMOTO
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
415.10 by a preponderance of the evidence. Defendant has not presented sufficient evidence to overcome the presumption of validity afforded to the registered process server’s return.
Therefore, the motion to quash service of summons is DENIED.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CAPITAL ONE, N.A. VS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
HOLMAN-IDOMOTO PLEADINGS Tentative Ruling: There is no Proof of Service from the Plaintiff that the instant motion and other attachments, declarations have been serviced/notice to the Defendant. This hearing is continued until October 1, 2026 at 8:00 a.m., Dept. M205. Plaintiff is to give notice and file a Proof of Service with this court at least 5 days in advance of the hearing date.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MARINER FINANCE, LLC VS MOTION TO DEEM REQUESTS CVME2515887 BARAHONA FOR ADMISSIONS ADMITTED Tentative Ruling: Motion is unopposed. Motion is GRANTED. Requests for Admission propounded on 03/27/2026 are deemed admitted. Court to sign the proposed order.
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR ORDER DEEMING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS CVME2517635 SPECIFIED IN PLAINTIFF’S MCCREIGHT, AN INDIVIDUAL REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS ADMITTED Tentative Ruling: Motion is unopposed. Motion is GRANTED. Requests for Admission propounded on 05/13/2026 are deemed admitted. Court to sign the proposed order.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”