Quiroz v. Cable Tech Corp.

Defendant’s evidence are immaterial to the disposition of the motion.

Defendant to give notice.

109 Quiroz v. Cable Tech Motion to Consolidate Corp., 2023-01340996

110 Shelton v. Children’s Motions for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication – Hospital of Orange NO TENTATIVE AS OF 08/19/2026 – CHECK BACK County, 2025-01451163

111 Solouki v. Saint-Gobain Motion to be Relieved as Counsel – CONTINUED Performance Plastics Corp., 2025-01507443 Gloria Tumanyan (“Moving Attorney”) moves to be relieved as counsel of record for plaintiff Tony Solouki.

Moving Attorney has not submitted the mandatory declaration (MC-052) and proposed order forms (MC- 053) required under the California Rules of Court.

Thus, the motion is CONTINUED to September 28, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department N14. Moving Attorney is ORDERED to timely file and serve the appropriate forms prior to the continued hearing date.

Moving Attorney to give notice.

112 Virgili v. Crites, 2025- Motion to Compel Arbitration – CONTINUED TO 01527043 12/12/2026, 9:00 a.m. PER COURT’S 08/13/2026 ORDER

113 Yu v. Universal Waste Motion for Leave to Amend – MOOT Systems, 2026- 01548728

114 Red Hill Village v. Motion for Attorney Fees – GRANTED Shere, 2024-01424721 After this Court granted Plaintiff Red Hill Village, LLC’s motion for summary judgment, judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Kaiser Shere. Based on the parties’ contract, Plaintiff now moves for an order granting attorney fees in the amount of $35,349.50.

The Court OVERRULES Defendant’s Evidentiary Objections Nos. 1, 2, 4-9, 11, 12. The Court SUSTAINS Objection Nos. 3 and 10 on the ground the “transaction listing report” attached as Exhibit 1 is hearsay.

Attorney Fees Provision Plaintiff brings the instant motion for attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717, pursuant to an agreement by the parties.

“ ‘Before section 1717 comes into play, it is necessary to determine whether the parties entered into an agreement for the payment of attorney fees, and if so, the scope of the attorney fee agreement.’ [Citation.]” (Mountain Air Enterprises, LLC v. Sundowner Tower, LLC (2017) 3 Cal.5th 744, 752.)

Defendant argues that Plaintiff did not attach or authenticate the Lease or Guaranty containing the fee clause. However, the reply argues that the operative Lease and Guaranty were submitted previously and attached to the Declaration of Bonaparte Lui in conjunction with Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and requests that the Court take judicial notice of the documents filed on June 12, 2025.

The Court takes judicial notice of the Declaration of Bonaparte Lui in conjunction with Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, pursuant to Evidence Code section 452(d). (ROA 55.)