DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2024-01426311·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayCONTINUED

DeJesse vs. MRV Marketing, LLC

Unknown

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
C23
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jan 25, 2027

Ruling

before the designated hearing time. Once the online check-in is completed, participants will be prompted to join the courtroom’s Zoom hearing session. Participants will initially be directed to a virtual waiting room pending the start of their specific video hearing. Check-in instructions and instructional video are available at. The Court’s “Appearance Procedures and Information--Civil Unlimited and Complex” and “Guidelines for Remote Appearances” also are available at. Those procedures and guidelines will be strictly enforced.

Public Access: The courtroom remains open for all evidentiary and non-evidentiary proceedings. Members of the media or public may obtain access to law and motion hearings in this department by either coming to the department at the designated hearing time or contacting the courtroom clerk at (657) 622-5223 to obtain login information. For remote appearances by the media or public, please contact the courtroom clerk 24 hours in advance so as not to interrupt the hearings.

NO FILMING, BROADCASTING, PHOTOGRAPHY, OR ELECTRONIC RECORDING IS PERMITTED OF THE VIDEO SESSION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 1.150 AND ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT RULE 180.

# Case Name Case Number Tentative 1. DeJesse vs. MRV Marketing, LLC 2024-01426311 CONTINUED TO JANUARY 25, 2027, as stated in the August 17, 2026 Minute Order.

2. In Re: Verdell 2026-01577324 Before the court is the unopposed motion of petitioner DRB Capital, LLC (Petitioner) seeking an order approving the transfer of structured settlement payment rights by and between payee and real party in interest Jahara Verdell (Payee) and Petitioner pursuant to California Insurance Code section 10134 et seq. Specifically, the parties seek court approval of the proposal for Payee to transfer the right to receive a single lump sum payment of $305,250 on August 24,2027, in exchange for a present lump sum payment of $274,010.71.

The future payment of $305,250.00 has a discounted present value of $287,113.05, which means Payee will receive 95.44 percent of that value and this proposed transaction has an equivalent interest rate of 8.98 percent. The Court, having reviewed and considered the petition, together with all other such relevant matters, finds there is good cause to approve the transfer of structured settlement payment rights by and between Payee and Petitioner. The court makes the following findings as required by Insurance

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share