DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV-05216·merced·Civil·Forfeiture
Hearing todayAppearance required.

People vs $309,481.10 U.S. Currency

Status Conference

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
8
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$309,481.10

Parties

PlaintiffPeople
Defendant$309,481.10 U.S. Currency

Ruling

24CV-04428 People vs $13,071.00 US Currency

Status Conference

Appearance required.

24CV-05216 People vs $309,481.10 U.S. Currency

Status Conference

Appearance required.

25CV-01659 Joe Chavez vs General Motors, LLC

Motion to Dismiss for Discovery Violations; Request for Award of Costs

The motion to dismiss for discovery violations pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 871.26, subdivision (j)(3) is GRANTED, and the case dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The Court finds Plaintiff has failed to show good cause for his repeated noncompliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 871.26, subdivision (c)(1).

The Court will sign the order lodged with the court on June 26, 2026.

25CV-05312 Jaime Navarro, et al. vs Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Motion To: (1) Deem the Truth of the Matters Specified in Nationwide’s Requests for Admission Admitted (2) Compel Plaintiffs’ Objection-Free Responses to Nationwide’s Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Production of Document; (3) Compel Plaintiffs’ Production of Documents

Defendant’s motion to compel responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, is GRANTED.

Plaintiffs have failed to provide timely responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One. Objections are waived.

Plaintiffs shall serve code-compliant verified responses, without objections, within ten (10) days of the date of service of this order.

Defendant’s motion to compel responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, is GRANTED.

Plaintiffs have failed to provide timely responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One. Objections are waived.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share