All cases
EDWARDS vs HISTORIC MISSION INN CORPORATION
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
10
Judge
—
Prevailing
Defendant
Motion type
Parties
PlaintiffEDWARDS
DefendantHISTORIC MISSION INN CORPORATION
Ruling
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME EDWARDS vs HISTORIC CVRI2406315 MISSION INN MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND CORPORATION Tentative Ruling:
Denied because the claim is time-barred. Contrary to the moving party’s arguments in her Reply, the Third Amended Complaint has not been filed with the Court in that leave has not been granted to file it. The operative complaint is the Second Amended Complaint.
Cited authorities
Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.