HOSEY vs COUPANG GLOBAL LLC.

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HOSEY vs COUPANG CVRI2203044 HEARING ON FINAL APPROVAL GLOBAL LLC. Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss status of filing of motion and new hearing date; no papers appear to have yet been filed.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY MACIAS vs EMPIRE CVRI2400688 APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION DEMOLITION, INC. SETTLEMENT Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss:

1. Date for hearing on motion for final approval (order, ¶¶s 6-7, 10).

2. Was Phoenix the low bidder?

3. Delete the general release by class members. Must be limited to only those claims alleged in the operative complaint and to the class period.

4. Why are class members releasing PAGA claims? Perhaps add to the notice a reference to Arias v. Superior Court (2009) 46 Cal.4th 969 ((“a judgment in that action binds all those, including nonparty aggrieved employees, who would be bound by a judgment in an action brought by the government. . . . Accordingly, with respect to the recovery of civil penalties, nonparty employees as well as the government are bound by the judgment in an action brought under the act”).

5. Add to the notice the full title and date of filing of the document to which the settlement agreement is attached (Declaration of Shirin Forootan in Support of Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement filed July 8,, 2026).

6. Add to the order that the administrator will delete the last four digits of any SSN on any objection or opt out forms filed with the motion for final approval.

7. No declaration from defendant as to the class members’ likely age, education, experience, and fluency in English.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES PHIPPS vs TEMECULA TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF CVRI2504696 STAMPEDE SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES SET ONE Tentative Ruling: Deny as to all but sanctions; motion is directed at the objection only responses served April 21, 2026, but supplemental responses were served after the motion was filed (perhaps, as plaintiff’s reply suggests, with the opposition). Appearances requested to discuss the amount of sanctions, if any, to be awarded.