DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
20PR00039·santabarbara·Civil·Trust
Hearing 2 days agoCONTINUED

In the Matter of The Kenneth J and Carol R Plumlee Trust

Petition for Internal Affairs; Petition for Internal Affairs to surcharge former trustees

Hearing date
Aug 19, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 16, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$52,000

Parties

PetitionerKenneth S. Plumlee
RespondentAngela Shaw
RespondentNathan Shaw
RespondentTerri Shaw

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Trust Hearing Date / Time Wed, 08/19/2026 - 09:30 Nature of Proceedings Petition for Internal Affairs Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required. On November 19, 2025, the current trustee filed a Petition for Instructions pursuant to Probate Code section 17200. That petition requests that the Court makes an order related to the distribution of the funds remaining in the trust account. From the Minute Order filed on January 14, 2026, it appears the petition was granted in part, but received objection by Angela Shaw as to the characterization of a $52,000 check.

The Court ordered written objection filed, which was done on March 12, 2026. This objection places the matter of the check's characterization at issue, requiring evidentiary hearing to resolve. (In re Estate of Lensch (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 667, 676; Conservatorship of Farrant (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 370, 377.) From the Minute Order filed on March 18, 2026, it appears the Court granted a fees request and set this hearing for further review of the characterization of the outstanding $52,000. The evidentiary hearing on the check matter is set for October 16, 2026.

On June 29, 2026, Kenneth S. Plumlee filed a Petition for Internal Affairs to surcharge the former trustees, Nathan and Terri Shaw, for breaches of trust. A written objection to this petition must be on file by the hearing.

Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Jesse Zaragoza Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Jesse Zaragoza

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share