DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0047160·placer·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 8 days agoCONTINUED

GUINASSO, FRANCES v. CITY OF LINCOLN

Petition for Approval of Minor’s Compromise Claim

Hearing date
Aug 13, 2026
Department
3
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 20, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffGUINASSO, FRANCES
DefendantCITY OF LINCOLN

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 3 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 13, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M.

A review of the court record reveals no proof of service of defendant’s motion or the court’s orders has been filed.

Accordingly, defendant’s motion is denied.

However, the court, on its own motion, sets aside the judgment entered on July 15, 2026. The complaint lists defendant’s address as “1601 Vineyard Road #1100, Roseville, California 95747.” Yet, the notice of trial sent by the court to defendant listed defendant’s address as “1601 Vineyard Road #110, Roseville, California 95747.” Accordingly, defendant did not receive notice of the trial due to the court’s error.

A case management conference is set for September 4, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 1 for the parties to select a new trial date. Department 1 is located at 101 Maple Street Auburn, CA 95603.

5. S-CV-0047160 GUINASSO, FRANCES v. CITY OF LINCOLN

Petition for Approval of Minor’s Compromise Claim (Ryder Gardner)

Petitioner’s petition for approval of minor’s compromise claim is continued to August 20, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 3. Petitioner requests the court to approve attorney’s fees in the amount of 33.33% of minor’s gross recovery. Absent extraordinary and compelling circumstances, the court finds that reasonable attorney fees for representation of a minor are no more than one-fourth of minor's gross recovery. Petitioner shall file an amended petition on or before August 17, 2026.

6. S-CV-0053141 HOSTLER, GRACE v. TERNAVSKY, ALEX

The motion for attorney withdrawal is dropped from calendar as no moving papers were filed with the court.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 3 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share