In Re the Petition of Burke, Tyler John
Petition for Dissolution of a Corporation and Appointment of Receiver
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
demurrer to the complaint as to plaintiff Jeanie Zatkulak, the motion to strike is denied as moot.
14. S-CV-0057953 In Re the Petition of Burke, Tyler John
If oral argument is requested, it will be heard in Department 32 by the Honorable Trisha J. Hirashima. Department 32 is located at 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville, California 95678.
Petition for Dissolution of a Corporation and Appointment of Receiver
Petitioners Tyler John Burke and Donald N. Rios petition for judicial dissolution of respondent RBM Construction. Respondents have not yet appeared.
It does not appear the petition is yet at issue. While the verified petition was filed on May 20, 2026, Corporations Code section 1800 authorizes the filing of a “verified complaint” for involuntary dissolution and does not mention the filing of a petition. No summons has been sought or issued. There is no evidence in the court’s file that either respondent has been served the petition. No briefing has been submitted to the court. The court also observes that while the verified petition references two exhibits, no exhibits are attached to the petition.
Based on the foregoing, the petition hearing is dropped from the court’s calendar subject to being re-noticed by petitioner once the petition is at issue. Petitioner shall call and reserve a hearing date on the civil law and motion calendar pursuant to Local Rule 20.2.
13
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”