Jacobson, Annika v. Warren T Eich Middle School

2025, through the present. Defendant is entitled to discovery into any information that may prove or disprove an element of a claim or defense.

Defendant’s motion to compel further response to special interrogatory no. 62 is granted. Defendant shall serve a further response within 10 days of service of notice of entry of the court’s order.

Plaintiff’s request for sanctions for responding to this motion is denied.

7. S-CV-0055053 Jacobson, Annika v. Warren T Eich Middle School

Defendant Roseville City School District’s Demurrer to First Amended Complaint and Motion for Sanctions is continued to August 11, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 32.

8. S-CV-0055442 Davis, Andrew v. Temco Logistics

If oral argument is requested, it will be heard in Department 32 by the Honorable Trisha J. Hirashima.

Defendant is advised the notice of motion must include notice of the court’s tentative ruling procedures. (Local Rule 20.2.3(C).)

Motion to Compel

Defendant Home Express Delivery Service, LLC dba Temco Logistics’ unopposed motion to compel responses to form interrogatories, set one, is granted. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290.) Plaintiff shall serve defendant written responses, without objections, to form interrogatories, set one, within 15 days of service of notice of entry of order.

Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions is denied. However, plaintiff is admonished that repeated failures to comply with discovery obligations may lead the court to find an abuse of the discovery process and award sanctions on that basis. (Laguna Auto Body v. Farmers Ins. Exchange (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 481, overruled on other grounds in Garcia v. McCutchen (1997) 16 Cal.4th 459, 478, fn. 4.)

Motion to Compel

Defendant Home Express Delivery Service, LLC dba Temco Logistics’ unopposed motion to compel responses to requests for production of documents, set one, is granted. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300.) Plaintiff shall serve defendant written responses and responsive documents, without objections, to requests for production of documents, set one, within 15 days of service of notice of entry of order.

Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions is denied. However, plaintiff is admonished that repeated failures to comply with discovery obligations may lead the court to find an abuse of the discovery process and award sanctions on that basis. (Laguna Auto Body v.

7