MEYER VS BALON
MOTION FOR ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENT(S) BY NATHANIEL B. MEYER
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF BARKER VS PALM CVPS2400208 GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT BY SPRINGS AIR VICTORY CANTEEN, CORP. Tentative Ruling: Granted.
No opposition filed.
Moving party to submit proposed order consistent with the moving papers within 5 days of this order becoming final.
Moving party to provide notice pursuant to CCP 1019.5.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR ORDER TO SEAL CVPS2507588 MEYER VS BALON DOCUMENT(S) BY NATHANIEL B. MEYER Tentative Ruling: Granted.
No opposition filed.
The court orders the original complaint filed 10/9/25 is ordered sealed until further order of the court.
Operative complaint is now the 1st Amended Complaint.
Plaintiff to provide notice pursuant to CCP 1019.5.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME LASR ENTERPRISES INC., HEARING ON ANTI-SLAPP MOTION A CALIFORNIA (SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE) BY CORPORATION VS CHC CVPS2601090 CHC GROUP INC., A CALIFORNIA GROUP INC., A CORPORATION, CHANGHO CHUNG, CALIFORNIA MIHWA BANG CORPORATION Tentative Ruling: Matter taken off calendar pursuant to stipulation filed May 14, 2026.
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT OF SMITH, AN INDIVIDUAL VS AMBER NICOLE SMITH, AN CVPS2601155 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INDIVIDUAL BY SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Tentative Ruling: Moot.
Based on court’s ruling on accompanying demurrer, the instant motion to strike is moot.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”