DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PFL20200337·eldorado·Civil·Child/Spousal Support Modification
Hearing 8 days agoDROPPED

Ann Marie Azvedo v. Randy Azvedo

Request for Order to modify child and spousal support

Hearing date
Aug 13, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAnn Marie Azvedo
DefendantRandy Azvedo

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 August 13, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM

2. ANN MARIE AZVEDO V. RANDY AZVEDO PFL20200337

On February 27, 2026, Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking to modify child and spousal support orders. He filed his Income and Expense Declaration concurrently therewith. All required documents were mail served on April 23, 2026, however this is a post-judgment request and therefore service was required to comply with Family Code § 215.

This matter is dropped from calendar due to lack of proper service.

TENTATIVE RULING #2: THIS MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO LACK OF PROPER SERVICE.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share