County of El Dorado v. Logan Vilayvong Vanseeindrei
Request for Order (RFO) regarding medical insurance
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 July 9, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
11. COUNTY OF EL DORADO V. LOGAN VILAYVONG VANSEEINDREI (OTHER PARENT: LAYLENY ROSETE) 25FL0715
Other Parent filed a Request for Order (RFO) on May 13, 2026, requesting orders regarding maintaining medical insurance for the minor. Proof of Service shows both Petitioner and Respondent were personally served on May 29th and May 18th, respectively.
Petitioner filed a Responsive Declaration on June 10, 2026. Parties were served on June 15, 2026. Petitioner requests the matter be heard in Department 10 before the Child Support Commissioner pursuant to Family Code section 4251.
Respondent has not filed a Responsive Declaration.
The court finds good cause to continue the matter to August 24th at 8:30 a.m. in Department 10.
All prior orders not in conflict with this order remain in full force and effect.
TENTATIVE RULING #11: THE COURT FINDS GOOD CAUSE TO CONTINUE THE MATTER TO AUGUST 24TH AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT 10. ALL PRIOR ORDERS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDER REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”