Daniels v. Sanchez
Plaintiff’s Demurrer to Answer of Defendant James Sittre
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
(03) Tentative Ruling
Re: Daniels v. Sanchez Case No. 25CECG05589
Hearing Date: August 12, 2026 (Dept. 403)
Motion: Plaintiff’s Demurrer to Answer of Defendant James Sittre
If oral argument is timely requested, it will be entertained on Thursday, August 13, 2026, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 403.
Tentative Ruling:
To take the demurrer to James Sittre’s answer off calendar, as plaintiff has not filed a notice of demurrer, demurrer, or points and authorities brief in support of the demurrer. Plaintiff has only filed a declaration and proposed order in support of the demurrer, which is insufficient to support the requested relief. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.113; 3.1320.) Accordingly, the matter is hereby taken off calendar.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: SMC on August 11, 2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date)
10
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”