DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2026-01557178·orange·ComplexCivil·Motion to Dismiss/Seal
Hearing todayMOOT/GRANTED

Quiros vs. Feals, Inc.

Motion to Dismiss/Seal

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
CX102
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffEric Quiros
DefendantFeals, Inc.

Attorneys

Scott J. Ferrellfor Plaintiff

Ruling

Within (5) court days of this ruling, Plaintiff is also ORDERED to submit revised proposed orders on the two instant motions, setting forth the information required by CRC rule 2.550(e)(1)(A), as well as identifying the specific filings—by pleading title and ROA number—that are to be sealed in accordance with this ruling.

Plaintiff shall give notice.

110 Quiros vs. Feals, Inc. Motion to Dismiss/Seal

2026-01557178 On 5/26/2026, Plaintiff Eric Quiros filed a “Motion to Approve Dismissal and to Seal Portions of: (1) Declaration Of Plaintiff Eric Quiros In Support Of His Request For Dismissal Pursuant To CRC 3.770; (2) Declaration Of Scott J. Ferrell In Support Of Request For Dismissal Pursuant To CRC 3.770.” (ROA #29.)

On 6/18/2026, the Court signed and entered an Order of Dismissal dismissing the matter with prejudice as to Plaintiff’s individual claims and without prejudice as to the putative class. (ROA #34.) Therefore, the motion to dismiss portion of the instant motion is now MOOT.

The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to seal the unredacted versions of the referenced declarations, which were lodged with the Court in accordance with Plaintiff’s Notice of Lodging filed at ROA #21. The motion is narrowly tailored and seeks to seal only the amount of the settlement reached between Plaintiff and Defendant in this case.

The Court finds that Plaintiff has proved facts that establish: (1) there exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the record; (2) the overriding interest supports sealing the record; (3) a substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; (4) the proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and (5) no less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest. (Cal. Rules of Court [CRC], rule 2.550(d).)

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the unredacted versions of the Quiros and Ferrell Declarations, lodged in accordance with the notice filed at RO A#21, be placed under permanent seal.

Plaintiff shall give notice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share