DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases

Chang vs. HIOSSEN, Inc.

Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
CX102
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffChang
DefendantHIOSSEN, Inc.

Ruling

106 Chang vs. HIOSSEN, Inc., a California corporation

2025-01535790 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint

VACATED PER STIP AND ORDER 108 Ruiz vs. Youstina

2025-01489341 1. Motion to Compel Production/Inspection of Documents or Things (ROA 42) 2. Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories (ROA 43)

CONTINUED PER STIP AND ORDER 109 Balt USA, LLC vs. Treadstone Medical LLC

2021-01237081 1. Motion to Seal (ROA 1814) 2. Motion to Seal (ROA 1875)

Plaintiff Balt USA, LLC’s two motions to seal filed at ROA #1814 and #1875 are GRANTED.

Plaintiff’s motion at ROA #1814 seeks to permanently seal the following:

(1) Exhibits 3-6, 40, 53, 73-74, 80-81, 89, 91, and 114 to the Omnibus Declaration Of Eric Kohan In Support Of Plaintiff Balt Usa, LLC’s Opposition To Motion For Summary Adjudication As To The Catheter Access Puncture Tool And Braided Stent (ROA #1812 [Kohan Omnibus Decl. 1]), including ROA #1819, 1826, 1831, and 1832 [additional exhibit volumes to Kohan Omnibus Decl. 1]); (2) Portions of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for Summary Adjudication as to the Catheter Access Puncture Tool (ROA #1823), which reference those exhibits; (3) Portions of Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Adjudication as to the Catheter Access Puncture Tool (ROA #1824), which reference those exhibits; (4) Portions of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for Summary Adjudication as to the Braided Stent (ROA #1821), which reference those exhibits; and

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share