Petition to compel further responses for production of documents
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
To access the courtroom, click or copy and paste this link into your internet browser and scroll to
Department 6: https://santaclara.courts.ca.gov/online-services/remote-hearings
LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 22CV394602 Suzana Hosin vs. Defendant flied a motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff. Plaintiff filed no 1 Timothy Davis, et.al. answer to defendant’s motion. Plaintiff had an accident working for the county and was given a leave of absence as well as assigned to light duty. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 9:00 23CV428070 “Janine” Chun Lu vs. See below. 2 Marc Goubert, et.al. 9:00 24CV444705 Atta Shehadey vs. Defendant filed a motion to compel further discovery.
Plaintiff filed no response 3 Edward Minasian, et. to Defendant’s petition. Plaintiff’s answers were either evasive or invited a more al. full response. Defendant’s petition to compel further discovery is GRANTED. Monetary sanctions are GRANTED. 9:00 24CV454184 Mussa Seid vs. Uber See Line 4 below. 4 Technologies, Inc. 9:00 24CV449505 Teyhuan Ahluwalia Plaintiff petitions this court to compel defendant Rockwell Group Europe for further 5 vs. Children’s responses for production of documents as to Set One.
The document request was Discovery Museum of served on defendant on March 27, 2025—over a year’s time. Plaintiff’s petition is San Jose et.al. GRANTED. Defendant in its moving papers indicated it can propound further discovery within 60 -90 days. Defendant is ordered to comply with court’s order within 60 days. Monetary sanctions of $2,745.00 are GRANTED. 9:00 24CV454184 Bernadette Erlach vs. Case is continued. 6 General Motors, LLC 9:00 25CV461439 Greg Schwartz Walter See Line7 below 7 vs. Ford Motor Company, et.al. 9:00 25CV471971 Ngo Vien vs June Plaintiff moves this court to appoint a partition referee.
While Defendant does not 8 Vien oppose the appointment of a partition referee, Defendant and Plaintiff disagree as to who the partition referee should be. Court requests oral argument. 9:00 25CV478684 Josep Vargas vs. See below 9 Hyundai Motor America 9:00 25CV481571 Capital Asset See below. 10 Exchange & Trading LLC vs. World Tech Co. 9:01 19CV358020 Bank of America vs. Claim of exemption to wage garnishment to be heard through oral argument. 1 Sunshine Roybal
2
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”