DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV00009·butte·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 1 month agoSUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

Giese, Dale v. Iversen Center

Demurrer to Complaint

Hearing date
Jul 8, 2026
Department
Not specified
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDale Giese
DefendantIversen Center

Ruling

6. 25CV03376 Li, Yi v. AMCAL Chico, LLC et al

EVENT: Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint

Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file and serve the proposed Second Amended Complaint within 10 days of this order. The Court will prepare the order.

7. 25CV04239 Midland Credit Management Inc v. White, Randall E.

EVENT: Defendant’s Motion and Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff for Failure to Comply With This Court’s Order to Produce Documents

Defendant’s Motion and Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff for Failure to Comply with this Court’s Order to Produce Documents is DENIED for failure to comply with the notice requirements of CCP 1005. The proof of service states the moving papers were served by mail on June 12. CCP 1005 requires a minimum of 16 court days’ notice plus an additional 5 days for mail. Factoring in both the June Teenth (June 19) and July 4 (Court observed on July 3) court holidays, June 12 is 16 court days before the hearing. Because service was by mail, notice was 5 days short.

8. 26CV00009 Giese, Dale v. Iversen Center

EVENT: Demurrer to Complaint

Demurrer to Complaint is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as unopposed. Defendant shall submit the form of order within two weeks.

3|Page

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share