DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CECG01236·fresno·Probate·Class Action
Hearing 9 days agoGRANTED

Pelayo v. Nations Roof West, LLC

Report by Plaintiff Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 384, Subdivision (b)

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPelayo
DefendantNations Roof West, LLC

Ruling

(20) Tentative Ruling

Re: Pelayo v. Nations Roof West, LLC Superior Court Case No. 23CECG01236

Hearing Date: August 11, 2026 (Dept. 501)

Motion: Report by Plaintiff Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 384, Subdivision (b)

Tentative Ruling:

To approve the report by the class settlement administrator. To direct class counsel to submit, within five days, an updated amended order granting final approval of the settlement and entering judgment which accounts for the disposition of all funds. In the future though, funds from uncashed checks should not be distributed until authorized by the court. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 384, subd. (b) [“After the report is received, the court shall amend the judgment to direct the defendant to pay the sum of the unpaid residue or unclaimed or abandoned class member funds ...”], emphasis added.)

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: KCK on 08/10/26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

14

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share