DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PR0305·eldorado·Civil·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoAPPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED.

ESTATE OF LINDA ABRAHAMSON

PETITION TO DETERMINE SUCCESSION TO REAL PROPERTY

Hearing date
Jun 29, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 28, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$166,250$252,000

Parties

PetitionerMyrna Lunceford
PetitionerDeborah Land

Ruling

June 29, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

12. 25PR0305 ESTATE OF LINDA ABRAHAMSON PETITION TO DETERMINE SUCCESSION TO REAL PROPERTY

Decedent died on December 25, 2019. This Petition is filed by Myrna Lunceford and Deborah Land, who are presumably decedent’s siblings, pursuant to Probate Code § 13150 et seq. That statute allows the Court to determine succession to real property outside of probate for real property that is valued at less than $166,250 for a decedent who died prior to April 1, 2022. The Petition indicates that the decedent died intestate with no surviving parents, children or spouse, and that no probate was opened for the estate.

The matter was heard on December 29, 2025, but there were no appearances. The Court continued the matter to allow the Petitioners an opportunity to conform the Petition to the requirements of Probate Code § 13152. At the hearing on March 16, 2026, counsel for Petitioners appeared and the Court continued the matter. The court issued an ex parte minute order directing an appraisal by a probate referee. The appraisal was filed with the court on June 17, 2026. The net value of the property per the appraisal is $252,000.

TENTATIVE RULING #12: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, JUNE 29, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. A STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION HEARING IS SET FOR 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, JUNE 28, 2027, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. PETITIONER OR COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PERSONALLY APPEAR, OR FILE A STATUS UPDATE WITH THE COURT AT LEAST TWO WEEKS BEFORE THAT HEARING.

13

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share