DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV005172·sacramento·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 years agoDENIED

INDONG ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC vs GREEN ENERGY GLOBAL, INC, AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, et al.

Motion to Strike

Hearing date
Jun 14, 2024
Department
53
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffINDONG ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC
DefendantGREEN ENERGY GLOBAL, INC
DefendantChoi
DefendantThorenson
DefendantRollie Peterson

Attorneys

Rollie Petersonfor Defendant

Ruling

23CV005172: INDONG ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC vs GREEN ENERGY GLOBAL, INC, AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, et al. 06/14/2024 Hearing on Motion to Strike in Department 53

Tentative Ruling

NOTICE:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to “Public Notice – Civil Division Expansion of Law and Motion Calendar” any oral arguments regarding this tentative ruling will be heard in Department 31, located at 720 9th Street, Sacramento, CA, the Hon. Steven M. Gevercer presiding, at 10:00 a.m. Should argument be requested by either party, the requesting party must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615, request the hearing, and notify the opposing party of the location and time of hearing pursuant to Local Rule 1.06.

The Court encourages parties to appear remotely for the hearing on the tentative ruling through the Court’s Zoom Application. But, any party wishing to appear in person may do so, provided that party notifies the Court by 4:00 the Court day before the hearing.

The parties may join the Zoom session for hearing on the tentative ruling by audio and/or video through the following link:

https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/sscdept31

SIP Address: 16083459993@sip.zoomgov.com

(833) 568-8864

ID: 16083459993

Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court-Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list

23CV005172: INDONG ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC vs GREEN ENERGY GLOBAL, INC, AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, et al. 06/14/2024 Hearing on Motion to Strike in Department 53

of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-13.Pdf

A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list.

Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk. If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will be forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an official reporter will be provided.

TENTATIVE RULING:

Defendants Choi and Thorenson’s motion to strike portions of Plaintiff Indong Advanced Materials, Inc.’s complaint is denied.

On June 6, 2024, the Court denied self-represented Defendant Rollie Peterson’s motion to strike to strike portions of Plaintiff Indong Advanced Materials, Inc.’s complaint. Peterson, an attorney, also represents co-defendants Choi and Thorenson, who bring the instant motion. Choi and Thorenson’s motion to strike portions of the complaint is based on the same grounds as Peterson’s failed motion. In fact, the memorandum in support of Peterson’s motion to strike was actually the memorandum of points and authorities in support of this identical motion brought by Choi and Thorenson, as a separate memorandum in support of Peterson’s motion was not filed.

Choi and Thorenson’s instant motion to strike portions of the Complaint is denied for the same reasons Peterson’s identical motion to strike portions of the Complaint was denied. Please see the detailed reasoning in the Court’s June 6, 2024 order denying Peterson’s motion to strike.

Defendant’s motion to strike is denied in its entirety.

The minute order is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to CRC Rule

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

23CV005172: INDONG ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC vs GREEN ENERGY GLOBAL, INC, AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, et al. 06/14/2024 Hearing on Motion to Strike in Department 53

3.1312 or other notice is required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share