Clay Montgomery v. Caitlin Montgomery
Child Support and Custody Review
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 CLAY MONTGOMERY,) Case Number: FDI-24-799969) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: July 16, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 CAITLIN MONTGOMERY,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 CHILD SUPPORT ISSUE(S); REVIEW OF CUSTODY AND VISITATION 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 The parties are ordered to appear in-person or by Zoom at 11AM. If a party chooses to appear 15 by Zoom, that party must abide by the Notice and Instructions for Remote Appearance in San 16 Francisco Family Court set forth above. 17
21
25
29
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”