DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR00310·santabarbara·Civil·Decedent's Estate
Hearing 9 days agoRecommended to continue.

Estate of Lisa Kristin Forman

Petition for Letters of Administration

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherLisa Kristin Forman
OtherZachary Forman

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Decedent's Estate Hearing Date / Time Tue, 08/11/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Petition for Letters of Administration

Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: The following must be submitted: Proof of Re-Publication. The Proof of Publication is woefully defective. Jurisdiction of the Probate Court is obtained by publication in accordance with Article 3 of Division 7, Part 2, Chapter 2 Probate Code. (Prob. Code, Sec. 8003(b).)

Publication requires the notice to be published in a newspaper adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in the city of decedent's residence (Prob. Code, Sec.Sec. 8121, 7122) and to contain the substantially same language and format shown in Probate Code section 8100. If the city of decedent's residence has no newspaper adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation, publication must occur "in a newspaper of general circulation in the county which is circulated within the area of the county in which the decedent resided or the property is located." (Prob. Code, Sec.8121(b).)

It is unacceptable to merely file a copy of the newspaper clipping as proof of publication. A Petitioner must obtain an affidavit executed under the penalty of perjury by the person with authority to affect publication at the newspaper. (Prob. Code, Sec.8124.) Santa Maria Times has not been adjudicated a newspaper of general circulation in the city of Lompoc, where Decedent was a resident. A declaration of substantial compliance (Prob. Code, Sec. 8122) cannot remedy this issue, because the Lompoc Register is plainly listed on the Court's website as the publication adjudicated for the city of Lompoc. REPUBLICATION IN THE LOMPOC REGISTER IS REQUIRED.

Proof of Service of Notice of Hearing (Form DE-121). Notice must be given 15 days prior to hearing, served on all known heirs and devisees, as well as on the Personal Representative (if not the petitioner) and special notice requestors. (Prob. Code, Sec.Sec. 8100 & 8110.) Notice must be sent to the person, not the person's representative. (Sec.1220.) No such document was filed as to Zachary Forman.

Nomination of Administrator. Petitioner does not have priority of administration over Zachary Forman pursuant to Probate Code section 8461. Please submit a nomination from all those with equal or greater priority. A written declination must be filed by or on behalf of an individual who is entitled to priority for issuance of Letters of administration but does not desire to act, or evidence must be produced that the person with priority is not competent under Probate Code section 8402 or refuses to act. (Local Rule 1752(d)1.)

Because republication is necessary, it is recommended that the matter be continued to a date to be set by the Court at the hearing, unless the party appears and requests a different date, or submits a request for a different continuance date prior to the hearing. (Local Rule 1721(c)(2)(A-B).) If the matter is continued, documents must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the new hearing date to be considered.

Due to staffing limitations, processing times may be delayed. To assist in processing, attorneys and parties should include the next court date in the "Filing Description" field provided by the electronic service provider. That field is also used for further descriptions of the document being e-filed, so be sure to put the calendar date FIRST in the field - BEFORE any further description of the document being e-filed (e.g.: 06/28/16 For XYZ).

Tentative Ruling: Guardianship of Rebeca Winnatu Montar Tentative Ruling: Guardianship of Rebeca Winnatu Montar

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share