DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PR00462·santabarbara·Civil·Decedent's Estate
Hearing 23 days agoAppearances required.

Estate of Donald William Morgan

Petition for Final Distribution

Hearing date
Jul 28, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherDonald William Morgan
OtherTabitha Morgan

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Decedent's Estate Hearing Date / Time Tue, 07/28/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Petition for Final Distribution

Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required. The following is noted for the Court at the hearing: Assignment by Tabitha Morgan grossly unreasonable. The proposed distribution does not comply with the intestate distribution scheme in the Probate Code. When a decedent's estate does not pass by a testamentary instrument (by failure of transfer, or omission, etc.), that property passes to the decedent's heirs as prescribed in Division 6, part 2 of the Probate Code (Sec.Sec.6401, et seq.). (Prob.

Code, Sec. 6400.) Tabitha Morgan alleges in supplement that she is assigning 66.6% of her estate to family members for no reason other than charity. This is a gift, not an assignment, and does not justify or warrant the Court to deviate from the intestate scheme in the Probate Code. Ms. Morgan is free to give her inheritance away to anyone she pleases after the Court orders distribution to her in accordance with the law of California. Therefore, the Court should find the assignments grossly unreasonable pursuant to Probate Code section 11604, and order 50% of the estate distributed to Tabitha Morgan so the proposed distribution does not depart from the law of intestacy.

Tentative Ruling: Estate of Eileen Annette Boston Tentative Ruling: Estate of Eileen Annette Boston

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share