DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0055740·placer·Civil·Contract/General Civil
Hearing in about 4 hoursGRANTED; OVERRULED AS MOOT

LEGRAND, BRIAN v. LEGRAND, KAREN

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend; Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant’s Demurrer to Defendants/Cross-Complainants’ Cross-Complaint

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
3
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBRIAN LEGRAND
DefendantKAREN LEGRAND

Attorneys

Brad McDowellfor Cross-Complainant

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 3 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 20 2026, AT 8:30 A.M.

4. S-CV-0054631 PTAK, CRYSTAL v. THOMAS, KIRA

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

The motion to be relieved as counsel for plaintiffs Crystal Ptak and Olver Jouin by Kestrel Law PLLC is granted, effective upon the filing of proof of service of the signed order after hearing on the clients, Crystal Ptak and Oliver Jouin. (Code Civ. Proc. § 284, subd. (2); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)

5. S-CV-0054704 DUPONT, DONALD v. CONFIDANT BOARD

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Vacate Judgment (CCP § 663)

Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 663 is dropped from calendar because the time for the court to rule on the motion lapsed on July 7, 2026, as plaintiffs filed their motion on April 23, 2026, and thus the motion was denied by operation of law. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 663, 663a, subd. (b); Machado v. Myers (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 779, 799–800.)

6. S-CV-0055740 LEGRAND, BRIAN v. LEGRAND, KAREN

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend to File Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint

Cross-complainants’ motion for leave to file a second amended cross-complaint is granted. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 473, subd. (a)(1), 576.) Cross-complainants shall file and serve the second amended cross-complaint attached to the declaration of Brad McDowell on or before August 31, 2026.

Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant’s Demurrer to Defendants/Cross-Complainants’ Cross- Complaint

Plaintiff/cross-defendant’s demurrer is overruled as moot in light of the court’s ruling granting cross-complainants leave to file a second amended cross-complaint.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 3 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share