DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24618363·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing todayOFF CALENDAR. No valid proof of service on file.

JIN WOO CHUNG ET AL VS. PEGGY J. CHUNG ET AL

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

Hearing date
Aug 19, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJIN WOO CHUNG
PlaintiffKWANGMI KWON
DefendantPEGGY J. CHUNG

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 19, 2026. Line 2. PLAINTIFF JIN CHUNG, AN INDIVIDUAL, KWANGMI KWON MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD is OFF CALENDAR. No valid proof of service on file. The proof of service for electronic service filed on July 16, 2026 is not dated. It includes no date of service. It also contradicts the declarations of Alex Park filed on the same date attesting to service by mail. =(501/SKF) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share