| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT
Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Monday, May 18, 2026, line 12, 2 - DEFENDANT SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MOTION TO STRIKE 1ST Amended COMPLAINT
San Francisco Unified School District's motion to strike is granted in part and denied in part. Code of Civil Procedure Section 436 provides: "The court may, upon motion made pursuant to Section 435, or at any time in its discretion, and upon terms it deems proper: (a) Strike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading..." (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 436.)
Matter in pleadings is not irrelevant or improper simply because it is not narrowly tethered to a cause of action. A party may plead facts for context. The court denies the motion to strike insofar as it seeks to strike allegations arising prior to the limitations period and allegations regarding age or sex harassment. (See Richards v. CH2M Hill, Inc. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 798, 802.)
The court grants the motion to strike insofar as the SAC names Asoni Cooks by full name, with leave to amend. Block may identify the student by first name and last initial. The court denies the motion to strike student Amari's name; this identifies the student by first name only. With respect to the district's claim that harassment by students is irrelevant, the court disagrees; the allegations provide context. The court's role on a motion to strike is not to edit the complaint.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (301/CVA) | |