Leyva, et.al. vs General Motors, LLC

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 23CV416550 William Brooks, et.al. See below. 1 vs. Cheryl Boomgarden 9:00 23CV417433 Bank of America vs. Plaintiff moves this court to set aside dismissal pursuant to settlement between 2 Onorio Pacheco-feria parties. Defendant and plaintiff entered into a settlement agreement to pay off Defendant’s debt to Plaintiff. Case was dismissed pursuant to CCP 664.6. Defendant has not made a payment since September 20, 2025. Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Defendant is ordered to make payment to Plaintiff of $5,364.14. 9:00 24CV449389 Samita Bhandary vs.

Plaintiff moves this court for reconsideration of the Court’s order on December 8, 3 Agradoot Ghatak, 2025 denying Plaintiff’s motion to reconsider the Court’s order striking Plaintiff’s et.al. complaint without leave to amend on October 9, 2025. The burden under CCP section 1008 for reconsideration is “comparable to that of a party seeking a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence...” (New York Times Co. v. Superior Court (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 206, 212-213.) Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. 9:00 24CV453156 Leyva, et.al. vs Defendant moves this court for demurrer on the fifth cause of action of the 4-5 General Motors, LLC second amended complaint.

Plaintiff filed no objection to this motion. Plaintiff’s allegation is fraudulent concealment. Plaintiff is barred from filing this allegation based on the 3 year statute of limitations. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

Defendant moves this court to strike punitive damages claim. Plaintiff has failed to contest motion. Since this court is granting Defendant’s motion for demurrer, there is no fraudulent concealment allegation that would warrant a punitive damages claim. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

3