DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
202200572082PRGE·ventura·Probate·Probate
Hearing todayThe accounts have not been filed; the court intends to set an OSC re Failure to Comply with Court Order.

In the Matter of Nathan Jesuse Martinez-Cahue and Celeste Angel Valadez

Account and Report 1st, 2nd and Final Account; OSC re Failure to File Court Ordered Account

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherNathan Jesuse Martinez-Cahue
OtherCeleste Angel Valadez
OtherRafael B. Cahue
OtherGuadalupe Cahue

Ruling

202200572082PRGE: In the Matter of Nathan Jesuse Martinez-Cahue and Celeste Angel Valadez 08/18/2026 in Department J6 Account and Report 1st, 2nd and Final Account for Nathan Martinez-Cahue for the periods of 02/17/23 through 02/16/24, 02/17/24 through 02/16/26 and 02/17/26 through 05/05/26

On 05/05/26 the Court ordered the guardians to serve and file a first, second, and final account for Nathan Martinez-Cahue for the periods 2/17/23 through 2/16/24, 2/17/24 through 2/16/26, and 2/17/26 through 5/5/26 on or before 06/23/26. Because all funds were held in a blocked account for the ward, the guardians were allowed to use form VN-267 for each account period.

The accounts had not been filed as of the hearing on 07/21/26.

The court continued the hearing on the Accountings and the OSC re Failure to File Court Ordered Account to 08/18/26.

The court ordered the mandatory appearance of guardians Rafael B. Cahue and Guadalupe Cahue.

The accounts have not been filed as of 08/12/26.

The court intends to set an OSC re Failure to Comply with Court Order.

The clerk shall give notice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share